447. (R, S)

Periodic review, order-up-to . The simplest periodic-review policy.

Decision rule: at every review point (every time units), observe the inventory position and order just enough to bring it up to . No reorder point — order at every review whether or not inventory is depleted.

Two parameters:

447.0.1. When to use

Periodic review — either because continuous monitoring is expensive (manual stock-taking) or because deliveries arrive on a fixed cadence (the supplier’s truck comes every Monday whether you want it to or not). (R, S) is the workhorse for this regime.

447.0.2. Inventory profile

Sawtooth, with reviews as the cycle anchor:

447.0.3. Set

The protection window is (not just as in continuous review!). Demand during this window has:

For service level :

The safety stock is larger than continuous-review safety stock by factor .

447.0.4. No in (R, S)

Unlike continuous review, there’s no reorder point — every review triggers an order, even if inventory is still high. Order quantity varies cycle to cycle:

Sometimes (just received last order); sometimes large (after a busy period). Average: (you replace what was consumed since last review).

447.0.5. Final formulas

Example

Given (same policy-comparison params + a 30-day review):

  • /yr, /day, , days
  • Review interval: days (monthly review)
  • = $2/unit/yr,

Step 1 — protection window

Step 2 — demand statistics over the window

Step 3 — order-up-to level

Safety stock: units.

Step 4 — typical cycle

At each monthly review, suppose inventory position is around (steady-state, average consumption between reviews).

  • Order: units.
  • Order arrives 14 days later. By then, inventory has drained further.
  • Next review: position is back near 517 again (steady state). Order another  990.

Step 5 — compare to (Q, r)

(Q, r) on the same demand: , , safety stock = 31. (R, S): , safety stock = 55.

(R, S) carries 24 extra units of safety stock (almost 2x). Why? The protection window is days vs days. Variance scales linearly with window length, so std scales as .

Trade-off: continuous review needs (Q, r) infrastructure (real-time tracking). Periodic review accepts more safety stock in exchange for simpler operations.